Dheeraj Ji, Thank you for your kind acknowledgement.
Today I went back to excel sheet and included total projects in Neharpar Faridabad from 2005 to 2012.
Additional EDC for year 2005, 2011 and 2012 is: 450.74 Crores from 668.65 acres.
Total area: 2160.4 acres and EDC since 2005: 2262.204 Crores without penal interest and interest. If we consider interest rate of 15 % on EDC imposed on builders than this amount balloons to 3000 crores.
I have factored in EDC from various projects from Neharpar Faridabad i.e. Sector 75-89 and not old Faridabad.
Expenses by Haryana Govt. on development of Faridabad:
Metro: 1400 crores till 2014
Master roads for sector 75-89: 340 crores
Sewage: ???
Electricity: ???
Storm water: ???
Health Facilities in Neharpar Area: NIL
Education Facilities: NIL
Badarpur Flyover: 400 crores
Faridabad Gurgaon Road: 400 crores
Total cost of development: 2540 crores.
Hence we can say that Development of Entire Faridabad district is funded by the Neharpar Area (sector 75-89) which includes rail over bridge, bye pass road, Gurgaon-Faridabad road, even Badarpur flyover (400 corers). Here lies contradiction; sector 75-89 are left wanting for development no let me correct my self, basic facilities despite funding the development of Faridabad town in particular and Dist in general. What is it that is holding Haryana Govt in spending money that is paid by the home buyers of Neharpar Faridabad?
Why not government provide connectivity directly to NOIDA over yamuna. How much it will cost: 400 crores for 8 lane bridge+ 100 crores for road: total 500 crores.
If government spend entire amount on Faridabad's new sectors, it will act a catalyst and multiplier effect will be generated. More and more projects will come and more EDC and later on property tax.
Registration income: If we take 50 % max coverage (for GH it is 33-35% and for plotted it is more. In the Neharpar plotted development will account more 75-80 of total area. Will generate somewhere 1200-1600 crores for the HUDA.
Later on property tax will generate enough revenue to fund the development of backward areas.