ERA Divine Court construction status and updates, possession, resale prices discussion

[BlessU]

FAOA,GF had filed a CWP against DGTCP for complicity in illegal activities of Builders in Greater fbd. The Hon.High court had ordered the DGTCP to give a written reply on the Irregularities of builder and inaction of DGTCP.
The date for reply of DGTCP was fixed on 26-9-14. But for reasons Unknown the case has been disposed off and DGTCP has been let off from the Hook.

PFA

Hi
Greetings

This is height of disconcern for the masses on the part of Judiciary, while open loot and extortion is being committed by builders, on the basis of monopoly with DGTCP for issuing housing licenses.

DGTCP has provided for composition of each and every offence by builder in the ACT, due to collusion and clear partnership of The Executive, politicians and the builders cartel.

MODI has done nothing to bring a strong regulatory body over "monopoly" of State on Housing. They are just waiting for elections to over and then suck up the aam aadmi.

Cheers

[naveenarichwal]

FAOA,GF had filed a CWP against DGTCP for complicity in illegal activities of Builders in Greater fbd. The Hon.High court had ordered the DGTCP to give a written reply on the Irregularities of builder and inaction of DGTCP.
The date for reply of DGTCP was fixed on 26-9-14. But for reasons Unknown the case has been disposed off and DGTCP has been let off from the Hook.

PFA

The Judgement of the court on Contempt of Court petition against DGTCP is enclosed.

[lalaraju]

What happened to the case involving Era Director. The hearing was on 25th Sep 2014. has he also been let off alongwith the DGTCP?

[naveenarichwal]

It was 1000 times more important for DGTCP to be held Liable , as compared to Era director etc. A great opportunity seems to have been wasted.

[puruu.mehrotra]

@jaspreet_246: Don't use such forums for emotional and idiotic outbursts and unnecessarily calling others cowards. Many are still not aware of any case against ERA. If you are complainant in any case against ERA for divine court specifically then share the details here, so that people can know about and join. Naveen Ji is only one who is guiding people here.

[naveenarichwal]

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city ... 544656.cms

GURGAON: Investors who have booked flats in a housing project in Gurgaon's Sector 99, have demanded an investigation into what they claim is a "case of cheating" because the developer had allegedly gone ahead with the sales without acquiring the relevant licence in its own name.

The project, Sovereign Park, was launched by Vatika Limited in 2012. But an RTI reply has revealed that it was not Vatika, but one of its associate companies, Planet Earth Estates Pvt Ltd, which was granted the licence by the Department of Town and Country Planning (DTCP), Haryana, to sell the project.

Moreover, according to the RTI reply (a copy of which is with TOI), the DTCP has not given any sanction to Planet Earth to authorize Vatika to sell the project. Also, according to rules, a company cannot authorize another company to sell the project, without due permission from DTCP. The RTI query was filed by RK Goyal, who had booked a flat in February 2013.

"Even after paying a couple of installments, totalling to Rs 26 lakh, Vatika was refusing to provide us with the sanction plan of the project. So, I took the RTI route and found out that the developer didn't have the license to sell the project," Goyal said.

He added: "The developer kept my money for over a year. When I told them I would file a complaint as they don't possess a licence for the project, Vatika agreed to refund my money without any interest. They also deducted Rs 85,000," Goyal said, adding he had also lodged a complaint with the economic offences wing of Gurgaon Police against the developer in June. He is, however, still waiting for a response from them.

Another investor, a senior citizen, said he has been writing to the developer to inquire about the progress of the project.

"I have been asking for a site visit for the last one year. However, there has been no satisfactory reply from the developer. I was a state government employee. After my retirement, I decided to invest in a housing project so that my children can have their dream home in Gurgaon. Now, after coming to know that the developer does not have the licence, I am suffering from mental agony," he said. "It's a clear case of cheating. I want my money back."

When contacted, Dayanand, an inspector in the economic offences wing of the Gurgaon Police, said: "We have told the developer to provide us the agreement signed between them and their associate company to sell the project. We will receive the agreement soon."

An official spokesperson for Vatika said it wasn't a case of cheating. "Licences in respect of Sovereign Park are duly issued in the name of one group company of Vatika Ltd," he said.

[umesh.prabhakar1965@rediffmail.com]

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/gurgaon/Sector-99-flats-sold-without-licence-RTI/articleshow/44544656.cms

GURGAON: Investors who have booked flats in a housing project in Gurgaon's Sector 99, have demanded an investigation into what they claim is a "case of cheating" because the developer had allegedly gone ahead with the sales without acquiring the relevant licence in its own name.

The project, Sovereign Park, was launched by Vatika Limited in 2012. But an RTI reply has revealed that it was not Vatika, but one of its associate companies, Planet Earth Estates Pvt Ltd, which was granted the licence by the Department of Town and Country Planning (DTCP), Haryana, to sell the project.

Moreover, according to the RTI reply (a copy of which is with TOI), the DTCP has not given any sanction to Planet Earth to authorize Vatika to sell the project. Also, according to rules, a company cannot authorize another company to sell the project, without due permission from DTCP. The RTI query was filed by RK Goyal, who had booked a flat in February 2013.

"Even after paying a couple of installments, totalling to Rs 26 lakh, Vatika was refusing to provide us with the sanction plan of the project. So, I took the RTI route and found out that the developer didn't have the license to sell the project," Goyal said.

He added: "The developer kept my money for over a year. When I told them I would file a complaint as they don't possess a licence for the project, Vatika agreed to refund my money without any interest. They also deducted Rs 85,000," Goyal said, adding he had also lodged a complaint with the economic offences wing of Gurgaon Police against the developer in June. He is, however, still waiting for a response from them.

Another investor, a senior citizen, said he has been writing to the developer to inquire about the progress of the project.

"I have been asking for a site visit for the last one year. However, there has been no satisfactory reply from the developer. I was a state government employee. After my retirement, I decided to invest in a housing project so that my children can have their dream home in Gurgaon. Now, after coming to know that the developer does not have the licence, I am suffering from mental agony," he said. "It's a clear case of cheating. I want my money back."

When contacted, Dayanand, an inspector in the economic offences wing of the Gurgaon Police, said: "We have told the developer to provide us the agreement signed between them and their associate company to sell the project. We will receive the agreement soon."

An official spokesperson for Vatika said it wasn't a case of cheating. "Licences in respect of Sovereign Park are duly issued in the name of one group company of Vatika Ltd," he said.

Janab,

I am sure all are aware that VATIKA, DLF and BPTP possess heavy investment from an influential name called ...... ..... Do you think any action will be taken by incumbent Haryana Government???????????

[naveenarichwal]

The haryana Government Incumbent as well as the party aspiring in future will do nothing against the Person. They are using this persons name only for electoral gains and nothing more.

Some matters are reserved only for Elections and these are always raised when elections are due and forgotten latter on.

[naveenarichwal]

https://www.scribd.com/doc/242526983/Pr ... Act-2008-3 Pls find the Haryana regulation for property dealers and Consultants act 2008.

This can be used against the Brokers who in collusion with the Builders trap the Common man in a Life long misery that loots their hard earned money.The property brokers and Dealers are also liable as per the act.

[naveenarichwal]

Courtesy rakesh@topraman.com

http://www.sebi.gov.in/sebiweb/home/det ... s-Limited-

SEBI's order against Era Landmark. (attached)

Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as "SEBI")

received several complaints against M/s. Adel Landmarks Limited (formerly

known as M/s Era Landmarks Limited)

August 4 Post on https://www.facebook.com/groups/331223303613874/

Sebi given direction to era either they have to return money of investor by 14 per or allot unit in the other there project. .....and they are returning money by 7.5 per....that why they are asking now people to take ur money back....

[bhupesh1004]

Need to do Something. There is no any end if we all wait like this.

[naveenarichwal]

Join those who are fighting at present Easiest to do.

[bhupesh1004]

Plz send me link. if any group you have on Facebook.

[naveenarichwal]

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Consumer ... 8670797543

[rajindelhi]

I am also a survivor of this project Low Rise 250 sqr Yrds.
is there any hope after new Govt formation in Haryana.