ERA Divine Court construction status and updates, possession, resale prices discussion

[naveenarichwal]

After reading all above story and also the story of era & BPTP , in present DGTCP Show Cause notice , It is 100% clear that this is an illegal act and all documents were manufactured by era to show the project as its own , whereas the Land and its approvals were illegally obtained by BPTP by Fraud not only against Buyers but also against Government.

One License out of 1042-1061 has already been cancelled because of Fraud by BPTP and another License of Era Divine court is on the verge of being Cancelled.

And still people say that it is not Illegal .

[shubho]

And still people say that it is not Illegal .

Sir, what is the action of the FIR filed with the EOW of Delhi police? Could we not file an RTI with MHA on the status and actions taken as per this FIR?

Thanks

[shubho]

DocketNo 5771010350215
Consumer Shubhojeet Gupta
CreatedOn 6/23/2015 4:42:14 PM
Sector Real Estate


I have just filed a case against Era (Adel) for the failure to deliver flats on the promised 36 months.

[puruu.mehrotra]

There has already been years of delay because of court cases, builder always want cases against it so that project can be further delayed, There is a group which is diplomatically dealing with builder and has negotiated to get work started at site, Request you to drop such cases and join them, to get possession. There is a long time ahead to fight cases.

[puruu.mehrotra]

someone wrote in caps "AND THEY ARE NOT GOING TO LIVE THERE.", from where did you get this gentleman, If I get possesion of flat w/o OC and registry I am going to live there anyways and most of 90 would, You have paid 95% of funds and you are not worried about it, you are more worried about paying 5% more and not getting registry, strange. who would worry about 5% and not 95%??

Let builder complete project and let people start living in. Everyone can combine and take a legal course thereafter. Bottom line is that this land and project is not ILLEGAL. Or we can it is illegal at this moment because of incorrect dealings between two builders, But nothing can stop it from getting LEGAL, once matter between BPTP and ADEL is solved. This project can never be illegal for ever, and wise people will know this, that legality angle can be dealt afterwards.

[lalaraju]

I completely agree with you Sir

[naveenarichwal]

Legal case is to build pressure on the builder & authorities to deliver legal possession. The High Court order clearly states that & removes the corrupt builder from limelight &hands over the power of final possession onto the DGTCP. although he is also corrupt no doubt but the pressure has to be kept via the court.
Those who think that diplomacy can work should continue to do that, who is stopping that but people who believe in legal action have firm belief that even if you tie the dogs tail to a stick for 100 yrs it cannot be straighten.
The diplomats in other projects of this builder got post dated cheque which they latterfound to be of no use and they were left high & dry.

[lalaraju]

Dear Sir,

Very well articulated, But it seems that you have forgotten something. I should refresh your memory
1. You were one of the members of so called RWA who started the legal proceedings against Era Landmark
2. You are one of the members who compromised with the Builder in return of a Flat in other housing society being constructed by same builder, thereby compromising with the interests of nearly 2000 buyers.
3. Rather than motivating other buyers against preferring possession of their flats, you should explain to all other buyers following:
1. Why did you compromised with the builder for your personal gain. You should explain to all why possession of their flat has been delayed, whereas you are living comfortably in a flat bargained off other buyers’ flats. No justification can negate the fact that ultimately it was you and your team that started legal fights with full knowledge that these types of legal fights take eternity to come to final conclusion. Shall we conclude that you intentionally started this with possibility of a bargain with the buyer for your gain since the beginning itself.
2. You are residing in Housing Society (Era Redwood Residency) constructed by same builder company against whom you are inciting all the buyers.
3. It was in your full knowledge that when you took possession of flat in Era Redwood Residency, all the towers had also not received OC. Then how can you ask others to not go for possession of their flat in Era Divine Court. You were ready to turn your eyes at that time as your intention was to have your own flat. Why didn’t you wait for all the towers to get OC. so that all the byers in that society also get the possession at the earliest

4. Why only we Divine Court buyers get your special kindness? Why not the buyers of Redwood Residency? Anyway We all would request you that you have hurt the interests of Divine Court Buyers enough. Please spare us and let us get possession of our flat. We the Divine Court buyers would like to handle our issues in our ways. We may not require your concern.
5. I must remind you that even those buyers who are still pursuing legal route had openly distanced themselves from you on this forum itself.
Sorry for some harsh words but we are losing our patience and can’t wait for any longer to get our flat that is adversely affecting our financial and family health.
Thanks & Regards

[naveenarichwal]

Lalaraju hi what I got or what I did was only because of intense pressure on the builder via legal action.The builder was on the verge of going to jail because of our legal action. I had flat in High rise in Era Divine court, & anybody who is sensible can easily comprehend that this high rise project will never be completed.
Look at the condition of low rise buyers who have there flat ready but the builder has not been able to give possession.
So what to say about high rise.
Hence proved that only legal action &that too intense, can lend to solution I. e possession & and not diplomacy because it leads to post dated cheques which bounce.

[naveenarichwal]

The High Court had rejected the anticipatory bail of Bharanas hence they had no option but to grant us possession.
If you read the post right from beginning of this discussion I had clearly told that those who take active part in legal action will benefit & not those who wish to stand by the side &watch Tamasha.

[naveenarichwal]

I had attacked the builder era & not BPTP, because my dealing was with era, hence the quick relief that I got I. e within short duration of 6-7 months.
Diplomacy would never have resulted in such quick relief.

[naveenarichwal]

Dear Sir please check your facts most of the towers in Era Redwood have received OC

[puruu.mehrotra]

Dear Naveen Ji, Yes legality is a big problem in high rise and not low rise, so be more specific to which part of Era divine court you are talking when you always try to bring in the legality angle.
And you always talk about ERA not offering possession, Do you know that ERA has started finishing work (though at a slow pace) and looking forward to give possession.

The biggest problem which delayed ERA divine court was reaching a stage of deadlock, where there was no discussion between buyers and builder, and this was purely because of legal cases. Deadlock is the worst situation to reach between any two parties.

Now our team has broken the stage of deadlock and there is healthy discussion going on.

We never comdemn legal action, but a basic question for you, what would be priority of order in moving forward in current situation
1. Getting a flat for which you have paid.
2. Getting a Legal flat for which you have paid.

A sensible practical person will always choose option one in current situation and then move to option two.
Let me reason it out, option one can never delay option two in any possible ways and we can simultaneously move ahead with option two.
But in current situation moving ahead only with option two will cause eternal delays causing agony to all buyers. So viable option is first one and then second.

[naveenarichwal]

Dear Sir if the builder is serious for possession than he should do that, this he can state in any court case &and tell that he is genuine builder, & the buyers fighting in court cases are blackmailers.
But this builder is different as you might have experienced upturn now.
He is not interested in delivery of possession,he wants to break the unity if people who are fighting in court by this process of diplomacy.
Until or unless the threat of going to jail or license to be cancelled this builder will not do anything in favour of buyers. Come what may.
Dear Sir whole project that is Era Divine Court &not as you are trying to portray as Only high rise, by whole project is illegal

[naveenarichwal]

I can understand your feelings when somebody says that whole project is illegal, but the High court order & the present show cause notice by DGTCP are 2proofs in support of this illegality of this project.
Is the DGTCP or High Court less wiser than all of us when they are ready to cancel the whole license because of gross illegality by the builders not only against the public but also against the government.